Webinars & Videos
Watch videos featuring supply chain experts
In global trade, understanding export controls and risk payment strategies is essential. In 2022, the U.S. imposed export restrictions on over 2,300 entities, emphasizing the need for compliance. Identifying the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) is crucial for transparency and anti-money laundering efforts, with global compliance costs reaching $42 billion in 2023.
To manage financial risks, businesses utilize trade credit insurance, a market that grew to $10 billion in 2023, and Letters of Credit (LCs), which facilitate around 80% of international trade. Companies can effectively protect their operations and navigate financial uncertainties by adopting these measures
Export controls are regulations imposed by governments to monitor and control the export of goods, technologies, and services to foreign countries or entities. These measures are primarily in place to protect national security, prevent the proliferation of sensitive or hazardous materials, and ensure that exported goods are not used for unintended or harmful purposes, such as military applications or human rights abuses.
One of the most critical components of export controls is licensing. Depending on the nature of the goods or technology being exported, companies must apply for and obtain export licenses from relevant authorities. These licenses are particularly important for items that fall under the category of "dual-use" goods—products or technologies that have both commercial and military applications. For example, high-tech equipment used in telecommunications or cybersecurity may require special permissions because they can be repurposed for military use.
In the U.S., the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) oversees export licensing for dual-use goods, while the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) applies to military-related exports. These agencies establish lists of controlled goods, technologies, and destinations subject to licensing, which companies must comply with.
An example is Huawei Technologies, which has faced restrictions and licensing requirements from the U.S. due to concerns about its technology being used for espionage. As a result, companies exporting technology to Huawei must obtain specific licenses to ensure compliance with U.S. regulations.
Customer screening, alongside restricted party screening, is another essential practice for ensuring compliance with export controls. Screening involves verifying that the recipient of exported goods is not on a restricted or denied party list, which includes individuals, companies, and countries prohibited from receiving specific goods or technologies. Governments regularly publish these lists, and it is the exporter’s responsibility to check their customers and end-users against these lists before completing any transaction.
To streamline this process, companies use trade compliance software and automated screening tools to assess customers and end-users, ensuring prohibited entities are involved. These tools cross-reference global export control lists, sanctions, and embargoes, helping businesses avoid fines, penalties, or legal action resulting from illegal exports.
For instance, during the U.S. sanctions on Iran, companies exporting goods to Iranian businesses were required to screen their customers against a comprehensive sanctions list. Failure to do so led to heavy fines for some companies that inadvertently shipped restricted goods to Iran.
Maintaining accurate documentation is a cornerstone of export compliance. All export transactions, including license applications, screening results, shipping documents, and other compliance-related paperwork, must be recorded and stored for future reference. Governments may conduct audits to ensure that exporters are following the law, and without proper documentation, businesses risk penalties or the revocation of their export privileges.
Proper documentation not only aids in audits but also helps companies demonstrate their due diligence in adhering to export controls. Detailed records of each transaction, including export licenses, shipping information, customer screening results, and contracts, should be kept for a designated period as mandated by regulatory authorities (often five years or more).
An example of this is Boeing, which, as a major aerospace manufacturer, must meticulously document every export transaction to ensure that its aircraft, parts, and technologies comply with export regulations across various jurisdictions. The complexity of the aerospace industry means any oversight could lead to significant legal and financial repercussions.
Understanding the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) in the downstream supply chain is critical for maintaining transparency, ensuring compliance with regulations, and preventing illegal activities such as money laundering and fraud. In downstream operations, which typically involve customers, distributors, or intermediaries, identifying UBOs ensures that businesses are working with ethical and legal entities, safeguarding against reputational and financial risks.
One of the primary reasons for UBO identification is customer due diligence. This process involves thoroughly verifying the identity of customers and intermediaries to ensure that business relationships are legitimate and free from fraudulent activities. Companies must investigate beyond immediate counterparts to uncover who ultimately controls or benefits from the transactions.
Conducting thorough background checks and using Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures helps verify the ownership structures of companies and individuals in the downstream supply chain. For instance, businesses dealing with distributors or end-customers in regions with high corruption risks should ensure that no hidden entities with unethical intentions are involved in transactions. By verifying the UBO, companies reduce the risk of fraud and ensure are not engaging in business with sanctioned or politically exposed persons (PEPs).
For example, if a company exports goods to a foreign distributor, verifying the UBO helps ensure that the distributor is not controlled by a third party with criminal affiliations, such as organized crime or terrorist groups.
Identifying UBOs is also essential for Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance. AML regulations require companies to identify and verify UBOs to prevent illicit financial activities such as money laundering and terrorist financing. Global trade data assists businesses in tracking financial transactions and ownership connections, ensuring transparency and adherence to AML requirements.
Businesses must adhere to AML regulations by performing enhanced due diligence on UBOs, especially when dealing with high-risk customers, countries, or industries. This involves verifying ownership details, financial transactions, and even the source of funds to ensure that no illegal activities are being carried out under the guise of legitimate business operations.
For instance, a financial institution providing services to a downstream buyer must assess the UBO to ensure buyer’s funds are not linked to laundering schemes. Failure to do so can result in hefty fines, legal issues, or even revocation of business licenses.
UBO identification also plays a pivotal role in risk mitigation by reducing the likelihood of engaging with entities involved in illegal or unethical activities. Identifying UBOs helps companies assess the risk profiles of their downstream partners, allowing them to implement necessary controls to prevent fraud, corruption, or exposure to financial and reputational risks.
UBO information to evaluate potential downstream partners, companies can determine whether they should proceed with the relationship or impose additional controls, such as requiring third-party audits or certifications. Knowing the UBO allows companies to spot potential red flags early, such as ownership ties to politically exposed persons, which could expose the company to risks of bribery, corruption, or sanctions violations.
For example, a multinational corporation dealing with a downstream partner in a high-risk country might discover that the UBO is linked to government officials with a history of corruption. With this information, the corporation can terminate the relationship or introduce stricter oversight measures, such as regular audits and compliance reviews.
Risk payment refers to the strategies and tools used by companies to manage financial risks associated with transactions, such as payment delays or defaults. Ensuring financial stability and protecting against non-payment is crucial, especially in global trade, where the risk of default increases due to cross-border complexities. Managing these risks effectively not only safeguards cash flow but also strengthens relationships with suppliers and customers.
One of the most effective ways to mitigate the risk of non-payment is through trade credit insurance. This insurance policy protects companies from financial losses from a buyer’s inability to pay due to insolvency, political risks, or other factors. Credit insurance can be obtained from providers such as Euler Hermes, Coface, or Atradius, offering coverage against domestic and international trade risks.
This strategy is particularly useful for businesses operating in volatile markets or dealing with new clients. Credit insurance provides peace of mind, ensuring that even if a buyer defaults, the company can recover a portion of the outstanding invoice, thereby protecting working capital. For example, a manufacturer exporting goods to a politically unstable country can purchase credit insurance to cover the risk of payment defaults due to unforeseen political or economic disruptions.
In practice, credit insurance not only minimizes the impact of non-payment but also allows companies to extend credit to new or high-risk customers, thus fostering business growth.
Establishing clear and well-defined payment terms is a crucial risk mitigation strategy. Properly outlined payment terms ensure that both parties understand when and how payments should be made, thus reducing the risk of disputes or delays. Payment terms can include due dates, early payment discounts, and late payment penalties, all designed to protect the seller’s cash flow.
For example, a company may offer a 2% discount for payment within 10 days (commonly known as 2/10 net 30) to encourage buyers to pay early. Such incentives improve cash flow and also reduce the risk of payment defaults.
On the other hand, penalties for late payments can deter buyers from delaying payments, ensuring that financial risks are minimized. Including such terms in contracts allows businesses to enforce timely payments and manage financial expectations more effectively. Clear communication regarding payment terms builds trust and helps avoid misunderstandings between trading partners.
Letters of Credit (LCs) are widely used in international trade to ensure secure payments. Issued by a financial institution, an LC guarantees that a seller will receive payment once specific conditions, such as the delivery of goods and submission of proper documentation, are fulfilled. LCs provide payment security by eliminating non-payment risk, particularly in high-risk markets.
There are various types of LCs, each catering to different transaction needs:
Sight Letters of Credit: Payment is made immediately upon the required documents. This type is beneficial when the seller wants prompt payment.
Usance Letters of Credit: Payment is deferred and made at a later date after the documents are presented. Usance LCs are useful when the buyer needs more time to arrange funds but the seller still wants a guaranteed payment.
For example, an exporter shipping machinery to a buyer in a country with high economic instability may request a sight LC, ensuring they receive payment as soon as the goods are shipped and the required documents are submitted. This arrangement protects the seller from the buyer defaulting after receiving the goods.
To explore our solution for Upstream and Downstream Supply Chain Mapping
In global trade, understanding and complying with export controls is vital to avoid legal penalties and protect national security. Businesses must also identify the Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) to enhance transparency and mitigate risks of fraud and money laundering. To manage payment risks, tools like trade credit insurance and Letters of Credit (LCs) provide essential coverage, helping businesses maintain financial stability. These measures are indispensable in navigating the complex landscape of international trade, ensuring companies can protect themselves from regulatory and financial risks while continuing to grow in global markets.
By adopting comprehensive export controls, diligently verifying UBOs, and implementing risk payment strategies, businesses can ensure that they operate within legal frameworks and protect themselves from potential losses. As global trade continues to evolve, these tools will remain critical for safeguarding operations, managing risks, and fostering long-term success.