Pursuant to Section 7031 by Department of State

The Department of State publishes a list under Section 7031 to identify foreign officials and their immediate family members involved in human rights abuses or significant corruption. Staying updated on this list is crucial for ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements in international dealings.

Mitigate risk with our comprehensive screening solutions for your AML and sanctions compliance.
466 Entities in Pursuant to Section 7031 by Department of State
Entity NameEntity TypeEffective DateStatus

Pablo Roberto Sandoval Lopez

IndividualJan 1, 2020active

Nelida Josefa Chaves de Gonzalez

IndividualAug 1, 2019active

Ulises Rolando Quintana Maldonado

IndividualApr 1, 2021active

Oxana Childescu

IndividualAug 1, 2019active

Kim Sophary

IndividualAug 1, 2019active

Abdulreza Rahmani Fazli

IndividualApr 1, 2020active

Wilson Cut Mule

IndividualJul 1, 2020active

Aishat Ramzanovna Kadyrova

IndividualJul 1, 2020active

Oscar Ramon Najera

IndividualAug 1, 2019active

Ali Reza Bayani Hamadani

IndividualJul 1, 2020active

FAQs

Why is compliance with the Pursuant to Section 7031 by Department of State necessary?

Compliance with the sanctions imposed pursuant to Section 7031 by the Department of State is crucial for upholding U.S. foreign policy and national security interests. These sanctions target individuals involved in significant corruption or human rights abuses, promoting accountability and justice. By adhering to these regulations, entities and individuals help deter actions that undermine democratic values and stability in affected regions. Furthermore, compliance minimizes the risk of legal repercussions and fosters a responsible business environment aligned with U.S. principles.

Which companies should comply with Pursuant to Section 7031 by Department of State?

Companies operating in sectors such as defense, finance, and technology should comply with the sanctions outlined in Section 7031 by the Department of State. This compliance ensures they are not involved in transactions with entities linked to human rights abuses or undemocratic practices. Adhering to these sanctions protects their reputation, mitigates legal risks, and promotes ethical business conduct.